The Psychoanalytic Discourse Allows a Different Kind of Therapeutic Engagement in Psychosis
The Letter, Issue 55/56, Spring/Summer 2014, Pages 103 - 118
THE PSYCHOANALYTIC DISCOURSE ALLOWS A
DIFFERENT KIND OF THERAPEUTIC ENGAGEMENT
IN PSYCHOSIS.
Patricia McCarthy[1]
For the psychiatrist, negative symptoms are viewed as a sign of mental illness marked by a symbolic deficit. Symbolic deficit flags the imperative of the Real and as such is viewed in an utterly different way by the psychoanalyst who views all meaning-making – whether the phantasy of the neurotic or the positive symptom, the delusion of the psychotic - as a means of compensation, a means of constructing a symbolic solution in the face of the Real. Ab-sens, understood as absence or absence of sense, directly indicates the Real. While at the core of the negative symptom, ab-sens allows the question of the subject to be posed. This unique pivot between ab-sens and the subject to come requires an introduction to the terms meaning, sense and ab-sens, in the hope of prompting a reappraisal by the non-analyst, of psychoanalysis as a therapeutic engagement that differs from any other narrative approach.
Keywords: negative symptoms; psychoanalytic discourse; Fierens; subject; meaning; sense/ab-sens; differance; a clinic of failure
Want to read more?
Subscribe to www.theletter.ie to keep reading this exclusive post.
Subscribe Now