top of page

Delusional Ideas of God and the Devil

The Letter, Issue 54, Autumn 2013, Pages 63 - 72


Tom Dalzell

This paper demonstrates that both psychoanalysis and theology have understood God and the devil to be two sides of the one coin. Concentrating on Freud’s 1911 Schreber case and his 1923 case of devil-neurosis,it concludes that imagos of God and the devil are based on the infantile experience of the father and it argues that both the psychoanalyst and the minister of religion need to be what Lacan called a 'little other'[i(o)] for the psychotic patient, refraining from correcting non-threatening delusions, but rather providing a space where the patient can reconstruct his or her world of sense and develop an appropriate sinthome to hold his or her subjectivity together.

Keywords: Freud, Lacan, psychosis, God, devil, nomination, sinthome


The intention of this paper is to draw on psychoanalysis to make sense of delusions about God and the devil and to suggest appropriate pastoral responses to the psychotic patient.[2] Psychoanalysis understands a delusion as the patient’s own attempt at healing or reconstruction. It will be argued, therefore, that pastoral care needs to suspend its theological objections since, if it questions a psychotic patient’s image of God or belief in the existence of the devil, the patient has to begin the process of reconstruction all over again.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to to keep reading this exclusive post.

Related Posts

See All

CMJOYCIRENSFW The Writersinger

From Chamber Music to Finnegans Wake through the Sirens’ episode in Ulysses, we have the revelation of aman who cannot really be a writer...

Issue 54: Editorial

The publication of Cormac Gallagher's translation of Guy Le Gaufey's acclaimed book Lacan's Notall: Logical Consistency, Clinical...


Couldn’t Load Comments
It looks like there was a technical problem. Try reconnecting or refreshing the page.
bottom of page