top of page

ARISTOTLE’S AND BENTHAM’S MORAL PHILOSOPHIES IN LACAN’S ETHICS SEMINAR

The Letter issue 69, 2020; pp19-30


ARISTOTLE’S AND BENTHAM’S MORAL PHILOSOPHIES IN LACAN’S ETHICS SEMINAR

 

Donat Desmond

 

This paper interrogates Lacan’s juxtaposing of the ethics of Aristotle and Bentham and Freud in the manner of a Hegelian dialectical triad of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis in order to develop his own ethical position.

 

Keywords: Aristotle; the good; Bentham; theory of fictions; Freud; pleasure principle; reality principle; ethics; psychoanalysis; Lacan

 

This brief investigation aims to explore an extract from Lacan’s Ethics of Psychoanalysis, Seminar VII where he asserts:

 

Bentham’s effort is located in the dialectic of the relationship of language to the real so as to situate the good - pleasure in this case, which as we will see he articulates in a manner that is very different from Aristotle - on the side of the real. And it is within this opposition between fiction and reality that is to be found the rocking motion of Freudian experience.[1]

 

What I propose to do is to explore this quote and interrogate it specifically with the following questions. Firstly, why does Lacan bring up Aristotle, a 5th Century BC ethicist, and contrast his ethics with Bentham, the 18th Century AD founder of Utilitarianism? Secondly, why doesn’t Lacan simply embark on a description of his theory of Freudian based ethics based on a supplementation and refinement of Freud?

Want to read more?

Subscribe to theletter.ie to keep reading this exclusive post.

Related Posts

See All

Nocturnal Whispers

While acknowledging that the inevitable encounter with language is the traumatic encounter par excellence that structures subjectivity, this

Sublimation and Creativity

The sublimation of sexual instinct is a concept that traverses psyche, civilisation, love, religion, work, art and audience. The aim here is

Comments


bottom of page