top of page

Note On Kristeva

The Letter, Issue 17, Autumn 1999, Pages 70 - 78


Pauline O'Callaghan

The work of the Bulgarian psychoanalyst, Julia Kristeva, provides an interesting parallel with the theories of both Freud and Lacan with regard to women. Her ideas on the formation of the subject; her theory of the semiotic and the chora; her views on the origin of poetic language and its relationship to psychotic babble; the maternal role and the abject; all of these seem very relevant to any attempt to understand the development of the female subject.

Kristeva, a Bulgarian living in France, contends in an interview in 1989 that psychoanalysis offers a way to approach foreignness and alterity because 'the Freudian message, to simplify things, consists in saying that the other is in me. It is my unconscious'.[1] She claims to be 'very attached to the idea of the woman as irrecuperable foreigner ... (having) a permanent marginality, which is the notion of change'.[2]

Following Lacan, Kristeva maintains that subjectivity is formed in conjunction with language acquisition and use and she challenges the unity and claim to mastery of a sovereign subject. However, she focuses her analysis upon the transgressions of the law of the symbolic in the form of the semiotic, which she argues is an integral and revolutionary part of symbolic language.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to to keep reading this exclusive post.

Related Posts

See All

A Gross Episode

In three letters written by Freud in 1908 and addressed to Jung, references were made to the addiction of their colleague, the rebellious...

Issue 17: Editorial

This issue of THE LETTER opens with Cormac Gallagher's article on sexual difference in The Logic of Phantasy, Lacan's Seminar XIV held...


No se pudieron cargar los comentarios
Parece que hubo un problema técnico. Intenta volver a conectarte o actualiza la página.
bottom of page